The Laubscher Institute for Research began as a small circle of researchers who believed good scholarship shouldn’t have to choose between academic rigour and public relevance. That conviction still shapes everything we publish.
Most research that matters doesn’t sit neatly inside a single department. A question about agricultural policy is also a question about producer livelihoods; a question about the visual arts is also a question about technology and identity. We started the Institute because we wanted a home for that kind of work — independent of any single university, political affiliation, or commercial interest.
From a small office in Kimberley, we built a model around fellowships, working groups, and open publication — structured enough to produce rigorous findings, and plain-spoken enough that the people affected by our research can actually read it.
A small group of independent researchers and practitioners establish the Laubscher Institute for Research in Kimberley, committed to interdisciplinary work outside traditional academic structures.
Working groups begin collaborating directly with producers, educators, and practitioners, testing findings against the realities they describe before publication.
The Institute publishes across the sciences and humanities, supported by a growing network of researchers, domain experts, and practitioners united by a commitment to rigorous, independent inquiry.
No university, political party, or commercial sponsor directs our conclusions. Our funding is disclosed; our findings are not for sale.
The questions we care about rarely respect departmental boundaries, so neither do our working groups.
Every finding is reviewed, tested against practitioners in the field, and documented before it reaches publication.
Most of what we publish is freely accessible. Research that stays behind a paywall rarely reaches the people it's about.
Each project begins with a working group, not a press release. Researchers, domain experts, and the practitioners closest to the question spend months developing a shared understanding before a single word is drafted for publication.
Findings are reviewed internally, tested against the people they concern, and only then released — openly, and in language built to be read by the public they serve, not just other academics.
The people who lead, review, and carry out the Institute’s research — across every active area of inquiry.
Every research institute is technically a machine for turning curiosity into evidence. We prefer to think of ours as a ship — mostly because it's more honest about who's actually working when nobody's watching. Click around.
We welcome enquiries from researchers, collaborators, and institutions who share our interest in rigorous, independent work.